|
Tuckiar v The King (1934) 52 CLR 335 is a landmark Australian judgment of the High Court. The matter examined the behaviour of the judge and lawyers in the trial of Dhakiyarr (Tuckiar) and has become a case study in and raises many issues for legal ethics regarding instructions by Judges and the behaviour of defence counsel and the treatment of Aboriginals before the Justice System. Dhakiyarr (Tuckiar) Wirrpanda, a Yolngu aboriginal man living a traditional life, was sentenced to death in the Northern Territory Supreme Court for the murder by spearing of Constable Albert McColl on an island off Arnhem Land. McColl had gone to Arnhem Land with a police party to apprehend some Aboriginals thought to have killed the crew of a Japanese pearling lugger. When he was killed, McColl was handcuffed to Djappari, a wife of Dhakiyarr. The trial lasted only one day, and the all-white jury took just over two hours to find Tuckiar guilty. Defences of self-defence or provocation were not put to the jury. The verdict was appealed to and overturned by the High Court of Australia.〔Ted Egan (1996) (Justice All Their Own ). Melbourne University Press.〕〔Tom Murray and Allan Collins, (Dhakiyarr vs the King ). Film Australia 2004.〕 On the way home from the appeal Dhakiyarr was himself murdered by unknown assailants. In an act of reconciliation, 38 descendants of Constable McColl, and around 200 descendants of Dhakiyarr Wirrpanda attended a 2003 ceremony in the Supreme Court of the Northern Territory, Darwin. This was chronicled in the 2004 film '(Dhakiyarr vs the King )' by Tom Murray and Allan Collins, a film that went on to win the NSW Premier's History Award and be selected for the (2005 Sundance Film Festival ). == References == 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Tuckiar v The King」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク
|